Autonomous Planning Agents and Task Reliability in Warehouse Scheduling Platforms

Authors

  • Astrid Eriksson Division of Software and Computer Systems, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 100 44, Sweden Author
  • Oskar Mattsson Division of Software and Computer Systems, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 100 44, Sweden Author
  • Julia Lindholm Division of Software and Computer Systems, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 100 44, Sweden Author

Keywords:

Autonomous Agents, Causal Modeling, Task Reliability, Warehouse Scheduling, Fleet Management

Abstract

The rapid expansion of global e-commerce has necessitated unprecedented levels of efficiency in warehouse operations, driving the adoption of autonomous planning agents for logistics and inventory management. While the deployment of these autonomous agents has theoretically promised enhanced operational throughput, the empirical measurement of their impact on task reliability has frequently been confounded by extraneous environmental variables, such as network latency, warehouse topology, and fluctuating order complexity. Traditional predictive models relying on correlational data often fail to isolate the true effect of autonomous planning capabilities on task execution outcomes. This paper addresses this critical gap by applying causal modeling techniques to observational data derived from large-scale warehouse scheduling platforms. By utilizing structural causal models and counterfactual reasoning methodologies, this study disentangles the causal relationships between agent autonomy levels and task reliability metrics, mitigating the biases inherent in purely associative machine learning approaches. The analysis reveals that while increased autonomy generally improves reliability under standard operating conditions, this effect diminishes or reverses during high-density congestion events due to decentralized decision-making conflicts. The findings emphasize the necessity of causal inference in robotic fleet management and provide actionable insights for designing more resilient, context-aware warehouse scheduling architectures.

References

1. Nikolopoulos, K.; Punia, S.; Schäfers, A.; Tsinopoulos, C.; Vasilakis, C. Forecasting and planning during a pandemic: COVID-19 growth rates and supply chain disruptions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2021, 290, 99–115.

2. Li, L.; Liu, Y.; Jin, Y.; Cheng, T.C.E.; Zhang, Q. Generative AI-enabled supply chain management: The critical role of coordination and dynamism. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2024, 277, 109388.

3. Mohaghar, A.; Ghasemi, R.; Taghipour, M. An empirical study on technology adoption and supply chain optimization using structural modeling. Supply Chain Anal. 2026, 13, 100181.

4. Krenczyk, D.; Jagodzinski, M. ERP, APS and simulation systems integration to support production planning and scheduling. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Soft Computing Models in Industrial and Environmental Applications, Zakopane, Poland, 27–29 May 2015; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 451–461.

5. Rodriguez Gamboa, J.C.; da Silva, A.J.; Araujo, I.C.S.; Albarracin E., E.S.; Duran A., C.M. Validation of the rapid detection approach for enhancing the electronic nose systems performance, using different deep learning models and support vector machines. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 327, 128921.

6. Wang, G.; Gunasekaran, A.; Ngai, E.W.T.; Papadopoulos, T. Big data analytics in logistics and supply chain management. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2016, 176, 98–110.

7. Aamer, A.; Yani, L.E.; Priyatna, I.A. Data analytics in the supply chain management: Review of machine learning applications in demand forecasting. Oper. Supply Chain Manag. 2020, 14, 1–13.

8. Kashem, M.A.; Shamsuddoha, M.; Nasir, T. Smart manufacturing: A review toward the improvement of supply chain efficiency, productivity, and sustainability. In Management of Disruptive Supply Chains; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 21–44.

9. Schoenherr, T.; Speier-Pero, C. Data science, predictive analytics, and big data in supply chain management: Current state and future potential. J. Bus. Logist. 2015, 36, 120–132.

10. Adeniran, I.A.; Efunniyi, C.P.; Osundare, O.S.; Abhulimen, A.O. Optimizing logistics and supply chain management through advanced analytics: Insights from industries. Eng. Sci. Technol. J. 2024, 5, 2691–3280.

11. Cho, Y.S.; Jung, E.; Hong, P.C. The impact of blockchain technology on lean supply chain management: Cross-validation through big data analytics and empirical studies of U.S. companies. Systems 2025, 14, 3.

12. Liu, Q.; Yu, C.; Li, Z.; Zhang, H.; Wang, F.; Fan, S.; Yan, L.; Li, J. Differentiation of jujube varieties using dual-hyperspectral imaging: A deep learning method based on convolutional neural network and bidirectional gated recurrent unit. Food Biosci. 2025, 72, 107441.

13. Zhu, K.; Zhang, X.; Ma, J.; Mubeen, H.M.; Zhang, T.; Lei, H.; Zhao, W.; Xu, H.; Li, M. Electronic nose, HS-GC-IMS, HS-SPME-GC-MS, and deep learning model were used to analyze and predict the changes and contents of VOCs in in-shell walnut kernels under different roasting conditions. Food Chem. 2025, 492, 145342.

14. Kumar, R.R.; Raj, A. Big data adoption and performance: Mediating mechanisms of innovation, supply chain integration and resilience. Supply Chain Manag. 2025, 30, 67–85.

15. Choi, T.M.; Wallace, S.W.; Wang, Y. Big data analytics in operations management. Prod. Oper. Manag. 2018, 27, 1868–1883.

16. Dolgui, A.; Ivanov, D.; Sokolov, B. Ripple effect in the supply chain: An analysis and recent literature. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2018, 56, 414–430.

17. Carbonneau, R.; Laframboise, K.; Vahidov, R. Application of machine learning techniques for supply chain demand forecasting. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2008, 184, 1140–1154.

18. Wang, T.; Zhang, H.; Wu, Y.; Jiang, W.; Chen, X.; Zeng, M.; Yang, J.; Su, Y.; Hu, N.; Yang, Z. Target discrimination, concentration prediction, and status judgment of electronic nose system based on large-scale measurement and multi-task deep learning. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 351, 130915.

19. An, T.; Wang, Z.; Li, G.; Fan, S.; Huang, W.; Duan, D.; Zhao, C.; Tian, X.; Dong, C. Monitoring the major taste components during black tea fermentation using multielement fusion information in decision level. Food Chem. X 2023, 18, 100718.

20. Kaushal, S.; Nayi, P.; Rahadian, D.; Chen, H.-H. Applications of Electronic Nose Coupled with Statistical and Intelligent Pattern Recognition Techniques for Monitoring Tea Quality: A Review. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1359.

21. Jiang, T. Mediating Effects and Moderating Effects in Causal Inference. China Ind. Econ. 2022, 5, 100–120.

22. Arunachalam, D.; Kumar, N.; Kawalek, J.P. Understanding big data analytics capabilities in supply chain management: Unravelling the issues, challenges and implications for practice. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2018, 114, 416–436.

23. Shah, S.; Boozula, A.R.; Lampuse, R.G.; Thakkar, J.J. A Systematic Framework for Reconciling Solar Energy Production Models with Operational Data: A Literature Synthesis and Methodology Development. Eur. J. Energy Res. 2025, 5, 7–23.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-31

Issue

Section

Articles