Adoption Readiness and Trustworthy AI Governance across Public Administration Agencies
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Public Administration, Technology Adoption, Graph Analysis, Trustworthy GovernanceAbstract
The integration of artificial intelligence into public administration promises unprecedented efficiency and enhanced service delivery, yet it introduces profound challenges regarding accountability, transparency, and public trust. This paper investigates the critical intersection between trustworthy artificial intelligence governance structures and the institutional readiness of public agencies to adopt these transformative technologies. By employing advanced graph analysis techniques on inter-agency communication and policy-sharing networks, this study maps the relational dynamics that facilitate or hinder technology adoption in the public sector. The analysis focuses on how central positioning within a governance knowledge network influences an agency's overall adoption readiness. Through a comprehensive empirical examination of public administration agencies, the findings reveal that institutional proximity to central governance nodes significantly accelerates adoption readiness, mitigating perceived risks associated with algorithmic decision-making. Furthermore, the presence of dense, cohesive clusters within the network correlates with higher standardized implementations of ethical guidelines. This research contributes to the literature by demonstrating that adoption readiness is not merely an internal organizational attribute but a fundamentally networked phenomenon driven by structural ties in governance frameworks. The insights provided offer crucial guidance for policymakers seeking to foster responsible and efficient artificial intelligence deployment across diverse governmental bodies.References
1. Bagheri, A.; Giachanou, A.; Mosteiro, P.; Verberne, S. Natural language processing and text mining (turning unstructured data into structured). In Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Real-World Data; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 69–93.
2. Committee of Experts on Internet Intermediaries (MSI-NET).
2018. Algorithms and Human Rights. Study on the Human Rights Dimensions of Automated Data Processing Techniques (in Particular Algorithms) and Possible Regulatory Implications. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Available online: https://edoc.coe.int/en/internet/7589-algorithms-and-human-rights-study-on-the-human-rights-dimensions-of-automated-data-processing-techniques-and-possible-regulatory-implications.html (accessed on 8 November 2025).
3. Palmiotto, Francesca.
2021. The Black Box on Trial: The Impact of Algorithmic Opacity on Fair Trial Rights in Criminal Proceedings. In Algorithmic Governance and Governance of Algorithms. Edited by Martin Ebers and Marta Cantero-Gamito. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.
4. InmateAid.
2024. The Impact of AI and Technology on Inmate Rehabilitation and Prison Management. Available online: https://www.inmateaid.com/information/the-impact-of-ai-and-technology-on-inmate-rehabilitation-and-prison-management-2024 (accessed on 2 October 2025).
5. Kache, F.; Seuring, S. Challenges and opportunities of digital information at the intersection of big data analytics and supply chain management. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2017, 37, 10–36.
6. Scherer, Matthew U.
2016. Regulating Artificial Intelligent Systems: Risks, Challenges, Competencies and Strategies. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 29: 353–400.
7. Westaby, J.D.; Parr, A.K. Network Goal Analysis of Social and Organizational Systems: Testing Dynamic Network Theory in Complex Social Networks. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 2020, 56, 107–129.
8. Farber, Shai.
2025. AI as a decision support tool in forensic image analysis: A pilot study on integrating large language models into crime scene investigation workflows. Journal of Forensic Sciences 70: 932–43.
9. Ding, F.; Riccucci, N.M. The value of alumni networks in responding to the public administration theory and practice: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic in China. Adm. Theory Prax. 2020, 42, 588–603.
10. Fosso Wamba, S.; Queiroz, M.M.; Trinchera, L. Dynamics between blockchain adoption determinants and supply chain performance: An empirical investigation. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2020, 229, 107791.
11. Queiroz, M.M.; Wamba, S.F. Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2019, 46, 70–82.
12. Mola, L.; Kaminska, R.; Richebé, N.; Carugati, A. Social strategies for information technology adoption: Social regulation process of mandated enterprise social network systems. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2023, 192, 122570.
13. Acemoglu, D.; Akcigit, U.; Kerr, W. Networks and the Macroeconomy: An Empirical Exploration. NBER Macroecon. Annu. 2016, 30, 273–335.
14. Kano, L.; Hoon Oh, C. Global value chains in the post-COVID world: Governance for reliability. J. Manag. Stud. 2020, 57, 1773–1777.
15. Lin, X. Utilizing Spatial Autoregressive Models to Identify Peer Effects among Adolescents. Empir. Econ. 2015, 49, 929–960.
16. Flavián, C.; Pérez-Rueda, A.; Belanche, D.; Casaló, L.V. Intention to use analytical artificial intelligence (AI) in services—The effect of technology readiness and awareness. J. Serv. Manag. 2022, 33, 293–320.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), unless otherwise stated.