Multimodal Perception Models for Situational Awareness in Autonomous Vehicle Testing: Model Audit
Keywords:
Multimodal Perception, Situational Awareness, Model Auditing, Autonomous Vehicles, Autonomous Vehicle TestingAbstract
The rapid advancement of autonomous vehicle technology necessitates rigorous evaluation frameworks to ensure safety and reliability in complex, real-world environments. Central to these autonomous systems are multimodal perception models, which synthesize data from diverse sensors such as cameras, light detection and ranging systems, and radio detection and ranging to construct a comprehensive understanding of the vehicle surroundings. Furthermore, the translation of this perceptive data into actionable intelligence is governed by the situational awareness capabilities of the underlying algorithms. This paper presents a comprehensive model audit of multimodal perception models and their resultant situational awareness in autonomous vehicle testing. By systematically dissecting the operational pipeline of these models, the study identifies critical vulnerabilities, failure modes, and performance degradation patterns under adverse conditions. A novel auditing framework is proposed, bridging the gap between raw sensor fusion accuracy and high-level cognitive understanding required for safe navigation. Through extensive analysis utilizing simulated environments and controlled datasets, the research highlights the discrepancies between localized object detection and holistic environmental comprehension. The findings indicate that while modern multimodal architectures exhibit high resilience to single-sensor failures, their capacity to maintain predictive situational awareness rapidly diminishes in edge-case scenarios characterized by high uncertainty. This audit provides essential insights for developers, regulators, and stakeholders, establishing a foundation for more robust, transparent, and accountable autonomous transportation systems.References
1. Baryannis, G.; Validi, S.; Dani, S.; Antoniou, G. Supply chain risk management and artificial intelligence: State of the art and future research directions. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 57, 2179–2202.
2. Babosalam, S.; Kargar, S.M.; Moazzami, M.; Zanjani, S.M. Occupancy-Aware Energy Optimization in Building-to-Grid Systems Using Deep Neural Networks and Model Predictive Control. J. Build. Eng. 2025, 112, 113714.
3. Zhang, P.; Li, T.; Yuan, Z.; Luo, C.; Wang, G.; Liu, J.; Du, S. A data-level fusion model for unsupervised attribute selection in multi-source homogeneous data. Inf. Fusion 2022, 80, 87–103.
4. Chen, P.; Fu, R.; Shi, Y.; Liu, C.; Yang, C.; Su, Y.; Lu, T.; Zhou, P.; He, W.; Guo, Q.; et al. Optimizing BP neural network algorithm for Pericarpium Citri Reticulatae (Chenpi) origin traceability based on computer vision and ultra-fast gas-phase electronic nose data fusion. Food Chem. 2024, 442, 138408.
5. Tiwari, M.; Bryde, D.J.; Stavropoulou, F.; Dubey, R.; Kumari, S.; Foropon, C. Modelling supply chain visibility, digital technologies, environmental dynamism and healthcare supply chain resilience: An organisation information processing theory perspective. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2024, 188, 103613.
6. Xu, X.; Lu, Y.; Vogel-Heuser, B.; Wang, L. Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0—Inception, conception and perception. J. Manuf. Syst. 2021, 61, 530–535.
7. Queiroz, M.M.; Pereira, S.C.F.; Telles, R.; Machado, M.C. Industry 4.0 and digital supply chain capabilities: A framework for understanding digitalisation challenges and opportunities. Benchmarking 2021, 28, 1761–1782.
8. Sanislav, T.; Mois, G.D.; Zeadally, S.; Folea, S.; Radoni, T.C.; Al-Suhaimi, E.A. A Comprehensive Review on Sensor-Based Electronic Nose for Food Quality and Safety. Sensors 2025, 25, 4437.
9. Lemos, L.F.L.; Starke, A.R.; da Silva, A.K. Constrained Gaussian Processes as a Surrogate Model for Simulation-Based Optimization of Solar Process Heat Systems. Appl. Energy 2025, 395, 126028.
10. Zhong, R.Y.; Xu, X.; Klotz, E.; Newman, S.T. Intelligent manufacturing in the context of Industry 4.0. Engineering 2017, 3, 616–630.
11. Shamsuddoha, M.; Kashem, M.A.; Nasir, T.; Hossain, A.I. Quantum computing applications in supply chain information and optimization: Future scenarios and opportunities. Information 2025, 16, 693.
12. Alzain, E.; Al-Otaibi, S.; Aldhyani, T.H.H.; Alshebami, A.S.; Almaiah, M.A.; Jadhav, M.E. Revolutionizing Solar Power Production with Artificial Intelligence: A Sustainable Predictive Model. Sustainability 2023, 15, 7999.
13. Wei, Y.; Wu, D.; Terpenny, J. Decision-Level Data Fusion in Quality Control and Predictive Maintenance. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 2021, 18, 184–194.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), unless otherwise stated.